Do small SMPSes really qualify as double-insulated?
Posted: October 18th, 2014, 10:34 pm
As they are currently built, I think not; between the potential risks of a breach posed by tin whiskers or capacitor remains (foil or electrolyte), and the equipment-killing misuse of Y1 class (or series pair of Y2) capacitors, I'm not really satisfied with them. They're not as safe or reliable as the old linear plug-pack supplies, that much is certain.
Personally, the only way I would qualify an off-line switching supply as "double insulated" would be to have the entire primary side on one PCB and the entire secondary on a separate PCB, or some other form of isolation barrier that can't easily be breached. But what do you think? It would certainly help to find a replacement for electrolytic capacitors (not that it's going to happen any time soon).
Personally, the only way I would qualify an off-line switching supply as "double insulated" would be to have the entire primary side on one PCB and the entire secondary on a separate PCB, or some other form of isolation barrier that can't easily be breached. But what do you think? It would certainly help to find a replacement for electrolytic capacitors (not that it's going to happen any time soon).