Web Browser Comparison at tomshardware.com

[shovenose]

I was going to write a full-length review/comparison of all the web broswers, but with this there is really no point.
Anyway, IE9 won!

[Kong]

Their (Internet Explorer) ratings are really good.

I wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1

P.S. Fixed thread name.

[shovenose]

I think IE9 is a good step into the future. It's fast, reliable, and standards-compliant. and that Chrome crap got pwned!

[Kong]

Google's only good for searching and translating, and that's that!

[shovenose]

haha...not much longer, i am thinking of doing an "experiment"...in a way that i can compete with Google and maybe even do something better!

[Kong]

Care to tell us?

[shovenose]

no

[Kong]

Oh. :s

[shovenose]

im going to host my own search engine. i need to learn how to host sites and its a good place to start

[Th3_uN1Qu3]

Okay... IE9 is still not standards compliant (doesn't pass ACID 3), gets owned by Opera in almost all CPU-intensive tests, and it still supports only 8 tabs at startup (wtf? didn't even know of this limitation, guess i don't use IE all that often). And it wins first prize. Seriously? I knew Tom's was unreliable... but this is too biased even for them.