HIGH QUALITY, HARD TO GET AND CUSTOM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS FOR POWER SUPPLIES, DISPLAYS, TVs, MOTHERBOARDS AND MORE!

Rock PS-RK500 Review

Discuss the Reviews and Articles on hardwareinsights.com here!

Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby shovenose » May 30th, 2011, 8:48 pm

User avatar
shovenose
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1898
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 5:36 pm

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby LongRunner » May 29th, 2013, 5:00 am

Actually, the label only rates the unit for 29A total on the 12V, so the original 12V rectifiers are enough...barely.

But yes, it falls way short of being good for the 5V rating.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby c_hegge » May 29th, 2013, 3:09 pm

You are right. I didn't notice the combined maximum there. I have fixed the review
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby LongRunner » May 29th, 2013, 5:32 pm

You don't seem to have done a very good job of fixing it.

248W

Should be 348W

Again, this is not enough when the 5v rail is rated at 28A.

Remove "again" (as it no longer makes sense after the edit)

While not undersized like the other rails, it is just enough.

Make that "the 5V rail" (again due to the edit)

Also, the link to the review from here is broken.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby c_hegge » May 29th, 2013, 6:44 pm

Done
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby shovenose » May 31st, 2013, 7:27 am

Some of the old reviews have borked links since we switched from MyBB to phpBB... I actually liked MyBB better but I knew how to make a good phpBB skin and not a MyBB skin :D
User avatar
shovenose
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1898
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 5:36 pm

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby Wester547 » May 31st, 2013, 2:12 pm

FSP overrating their PSUs, and on a 230V input!?? Shame on you, FSP! And a 20A rectifier when a 28A output is touted... I know it's a full-wave rectified output and that it has an 120mm fan but even then... 20 gauge wires and 680uF input capacitors are disappointing, too... what is the bridge rectifier rated at?

...Oh well. It's a half bridge topology, guess I shouldn't be surprised. Shoulda overspec'd more and gone with double forward, and APFC too... but maybe they just rated it at a lower temperature than 40*C/230V...
Last edited by Wester547 on May 31st, 2013, 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby c_hegge » May 31st, 2013, 2:22 pm

I don't think it's so much FSP overeating them. I think Rock just took a 400W FSP product and stuck a 500W label on it. I can't remember what the rectifier was rated at. I haven't seen one of these units since I originally published the review.
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby LongRunner » August 11th, 2014, 3:53 am

The capacitors on the secondary are a bit of a let down too, since all of them are made by Teapo.

There's also a CapXon near the +5VSB transformer.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Rock PS-RK500 Review

Postby LongRunner » August 17th, 2014, 6:37 am

I don't see any sign of an inrush limiter. There's just a wire jumper where it should be. If that is indeed the case, the inrush current could exceed 200A — very high indeed. Unless it's installed somewhere else, but I can't see where.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia


Return to Content Comments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests