HIGH QUALITY, HARD TO GET AND CUSTOM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS FOR POWER SUPPLIES, DISPLAYS, TVs, MOTHERBOARDS AND MORE!

Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Discuss the Reviews and Articles on hardwareinsights.com here!

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby LongRunner » October 7th, 2013, 5:03 am

Wester547 wrote:>5mV

I think that's supposed to be <5mV.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby Wester547 » October 7th, 2013, 2:34 pm

Yes, typo on my part, the <4-5mV range.
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby LongRunner » November 15th, 2013, 10:34 pm

That NetVista is a DDR1 board so 2.5V caps on the RAM power would be running right at their rating. They would be fine for DDR2 or newer, on the other hand.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby Wester547 » August 16th, 2014, 12:07 pm

c_hegge wrote:2. They were different units and both were used. My guess is that the other one was older and had more worn out caps.
I don't mean to necropost, but even in light of the worn out capacitors, you reviewed the HP-D3057F3H after you recapped the failed Teapos on +5VSB with Rubycon MBZ and Nichicon HE, and the ripple voltage on +5VSB, especially at the high loads, was much, much higher than it was even in the "before" polymod test (IE 3mV vs. 38mV...)... I didn't think the flyback section of the PSU, a completely separate part of the PSU, could be affected ripple wise by worn capacitors in the SMPS part of the PSU (the output of the forward converter) ? Or could it, since both sections of the PSU have different feedback?

EDIT: That's right, MBZ has a blue sleeve and MCZ has a black one.
Last edited by Wester547 on August 16th, 2014, 7:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby LongRunner » August 16th, 2014, 6:33 pm

It was an MBZ, not MCZ (if you look carefully, the sleeve is violet in colour). The only reason I can think of for the higher ripple even there was if the MBZ was worn-out too (after all, even Topcat can't say they're perfect).
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby c_hegge » August 16th, 2014, 9:37 pm

Yeah, the older (and cheaper) Hantek oscilloscope always seemed to give higher readings than the stingray does. I'm more inclined to believe the Stingray's results, though. Mainly because they agree with others like when testing similar units. For instance, compare my ripple results of the In Win IP-P600CQ3-2 and Antec HCG-750 with those of Hardware Secrets, and you'll see what I mean. They are not exactly the same, but close enough
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby Wester547 » August 17th, 2014, 9:24 am

So you switched to the Stingray oscilloscope in 2012? I thought the oscilloscope might have been the reason. I wonder if the Hantek one might have exaggerated the results for the ATX-300-12Z as well, along with the SU-430 and Coolermaster 460W.
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby c_hegge » August 17th, 2014, 1:58 pm

That's Possible. I'll only know if I get the chance to re-test them.
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Polymodding: Does it actually work?

Postby LongRunner » April 8th, 2015, 8:51 pm

Revised the text a bit. At least, if memory serves TMZ are related to KZG and KZJ (and note the black sleeves with gold print).
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Previous

Return to Content Comments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests