Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.
My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
I'm very interested to compare the results from Behemot's review of this unit and the one that was made at [H]. ( http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/06/ ... cN1B_mWzcs ) At [H], the unit managed to endure its hard testing methodology, let's see if here will pass as well !!
CPU:Athlon 64 FX60 (2-cores) 2,6GHz Mobo:Asrock 939a785g cpu cooler:ArcticFreezer13 CO GPU:Asus 750 Ti 2GB RAM:4 GB DDR 400MHz PSU:Seasonic Platinum 660 Tower:Coolermaster Elite 430 HDD:WD 2500AAJB 250gb IDE / WD 5003ABYX 500gb sataII Oθόνη: Asus VE228HR OS:Windows 7 64bit
CWT units mostly survive loading and even short overloading. But they are unsuitable for long-term high-load running as than they die quickly. Unfortunatelly my crappy meter still has temp probe broken and I most likely won't RMA it on time for this review…
by LongRunner » August 6th, 2015, 4:34 am 
