Contents
- 1Introduction
- 2Tsunami K P4-500W
- 2.1First Look
- 2.2Test Results
- 2.3Disassembly
- 2.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 3Honli ATX 680
- 3.1First Look
- 3.2Test Results
- 3.3Disassembly
- 3.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 4Powercase PHKPOW550120MM
- 4.1First Look
- 4.2Test Results
- 4.3Disassembly
- 4.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 5Aywun A1-3000
- 5.1First Look
- 5.2Test Results
- 5.3Disassembly
- 5.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 6A-Power P4-A680
- 6.1Test Results
- 6.2Disassembly
- 6.3Specifications and Conclusions
- 7Auriga Power MPT-301
- 7.1Test Results
- 7.2Disassembly
- 7.3Specifications and Conclusions
- 8Numan AT-580H
- 8.1Test Results
- 8.2Disassembly
- 8.3Specifications and Conclusions
- 9Ultraview 750W
- 9.1First Look
- 9.2Test Results
- 9.3Disassembly
- 9.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 10Thermal Master TM-420-PMSR
- 10.1First Look
- 10.2Test Results
- 10.3Disassembly
- 10.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 11Comparisons, Conclusions and Fireworks
- 11.1Graphs
- 11.2Conclusion
- 11.3The Fireworks
Aywun A1-3000
First Look
Aywun power supplies are no strangers to my load tester. At worst, they can be total junk, and at best, they have been just average. This particular model is available for around $30, so it might not be quite as bad as the A1-1000, but maybe not as good as the A1-550S. Let’s find out for sure.
The label makes this power supply out to be another 12V heavy unit with two 12V rails. As we will see later, however, that is not true. It is a single rail unit with a more powerful 5V rail.
Test Results
Test 1 (76.69W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 2.44A | 12.33V | 14.8mV |
5V | 5.15A | 5.15V | 11.0mV |
3.3V | 4.9A | 3.33V | 19.6mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −11.77V | 11.6mV |
5Vsb | 0.51A | 5.12V | 12.4mV |
AC Power | 102.1W | ||
Efficiency | 75.11% | ||
Power Factor | 0.6 | ||
Intake Temp | 24°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 28°C |
.
Test 2 (105.63W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 4.82A | 12.24V | 14.2mV |
5V | 5.16A | 5.16V | 10.8mV |
3.3V | 4.88A | 3.32V | 19.2mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −11.87V | 12.0mV |
5Vsb | 0.51A | 5.12V | 13.4mV |
AC Power | 135.9W | ||
Efficiency | 77.72% | ||
Power Factor | 0.63 | ||
Intake Temp | 25°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 29°C |
.
Test 3 (160.83W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 9.41A | 12.1V | 15.8mV |
5V | 5.2A | 5.2V | 12.0mV |
3.3V | 4.87A | 3.31V | 18.0mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −12.05V | 14.2mV |
5Vsb | 0.51A | 5.11V | 14.6mV |
AC Power | 203.5W | ||
Efficiency | 79.03% | ||
Power Factor | 0.64 | ||
Intake Temp | 25°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 32°C |
.
Test 4 (206.48W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 9.5A | 12.22V | 19.4mV |
5V | 10.14A | 5.07V | 13.0mV |
3.3V | 9.94A | 3.28V | 17.4mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −12.30V | 90.0mV |
5Vsb | 1.01A | 5.06V | 19.6mV |
AC Power | 260.3W | ||
Efficiency | 79.32% | ||
Power Factor | 0.64 | ||
Intake Temp | 26°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 35°C |
.
Test 5 (258.97W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 13.93A | 12.07V | 23.0mV |
5V | 10.2A | 5.1V | 13.6mV |
3.3V | 9.91A | 3.27V | 17.8mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −12.54V | 19.2mV |
5Vsb | 1.01A | 5.05V | 20.4mV |
AC Power | 332.2W | ||
Efficiency | 77.96% | ||
Power Factor | 0.64 | ||
Intake Temp | 27°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 38°C |
.
Test 6 (307.55W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 18.13A | 11.93V | 34.2mV |
5V | 9.88A | 4.96V | 12.6mV |
3.3V | 10.26A | 3.32V | 21.0mV |
−12V | 0.11A | −12.77V | 22.0mV |
5Vsb | 1.01A | 5.03V | 23.6mV |
AC Power | 407.5W | ||
Efficiency | 75.47% | ||
Power Factor | 0.64 | ||
Intake Temp | 27°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 42°C |
.
The 12V rail started off at 12.33V and had dropped to 11.93V by Test 6. This gives us 0.33V (2.75%) worst-case regulation and a 0.4V (3.33%) drop. The 5V rail had maximum and minimum values of 5.2V and 4.96V respectively, giving us 0.2V (4%) regulation and 0.24V (4.8%) or variation. The 3.3V rail had maximum and minimum values of 3.33V and 3.27V respectively, which equates to 0.03V (0.91%) regulation and 0.6V (1.82%) variation. On average, this gives us 2.55% regulation and a 3.32% variation. This result is passable, but not excellent. The 5V rail was what really let it down, as it got close to the maximum limit of ATX specifications.
The efficiency came very close to achieving 80%, but didn’t quite make it. The power factor results were slightly better than some other power supplies in this roundup, but still not great. By Test 6, the exhaust temperature was 15°C warmer than the intake, which is hot for 300W. In fact, it’s warmer than the other three units I have already tested. 300W was all I could pull from this unit. I attempted to increase the load to 350W for another test, but the power supply exploded after about a minute.
Rail | Test 5 (258.97W) | Test 6 (307.55W) |
12V | ||
5V | ||
3.3V | ||
−12V | ||
5Vsb |
.
The ripple was quite well suppressed on this power supply, with all of the rails staying well below half of the maximum allowed ripple at all times.
Disassembly
The input filtering consists of two X caps, two common-mode chokes and four Y caps, which is enough components. Instead of a bridge rectifier, we have 3A diodes. The primary capacitors are rated at 680µF and look to be from Nippon Chemi-Con (KMG series to be exact). However, we are sure that these parts are fake; the snap-in KMG series is long obsolete, and real 105°C Chemi-Cons have brown sleeves (with the exceptions of LZA, LXZ and LXY which are dark blue, older KZE which were green, and KZJ and some TMZ which were black with gold print). The switching transistors are Jilin Sino Micro 3DD13009K BJTs rated at 12A. Such parts are not generally capable of delivering more than about 350W.
The 12V rectifier is a YG906C2R, which is a Fast Recovery Rectifier rated at 20A. Considering that the 12V label claimed 23A of 12V capacity, a higher rated part should have been used. The other two rails use ESAD83-004R Rectifiers, which are 30A Schottky rectifiers and ample for what the label claims the 5V and 3.3V rails to be capable of. All of the secondary side capacitors are branded BH – a small obscure manufacturer.
Again, this power supply blew the switching transistors when it failed. Not only is there visible damage to the washers and transistors, but it appears that they got hot enough to start de-soldering themselves!
The fan is branded BaoDiKai, and it has also very little lubricant in the bearing. It is wired directly to 12V and was quite audible throughout the testing. The heatsinks are fairly thick, but they do not have a lot of surface to air contact. There was a small marking near the front of the PCB on the primary side saying that Keerda is the OEM. Keerda power supplies are often sold by Logisys in the USA, and do not have a reputation for quality products.
Specifications and Conclusions
Real Wattage | 300W |
OEM | Keerda Electronics |
PFC | None |
Price | $30 AUD |
ATX Connector type | 20+4 pin |
Worst-case voltage regulation (12v, 5v, 3.3v) | 2.8%, 4.0%, 2.6% |
Worst-case ripple (12v, 5v, 3.3v) | 34.2mV, 12.6mV, 21.0mV |
Worst-case efficiency | 75.47% |
Input filtering | Adequate |
CPU Connector | ATX12V (4 pin) |
PCIe Connectors | 1x 6 pin |
Molex (Peripheral) Connectors | 5 |
FDD Power connectors | 1 |
SATA Power connectors | 2 |
.
Pros: Good ripple suppression
Cons: Can’t deliver labelled rating (−2), Low quality capacitors (−2), Mediocre voltage regulation (−1), Low quality fan (−1), Inefficient (−1), Loud (−1), 5V-heavy (−1)
Score: 1/10