Contents
- 1Introduction
- 2Tsunami K P4-500W
- 2.1First Look
- 2.2Test Results
- 2.3Disassembly
- 2.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 3Honli ATX 680
- 3.1First Look
- 3.2Test Results
- 3.3Disassembly
- 3.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 4Powercase PHKPOW550120MM
- 4.1First Look
- 4.2Test Results
- 4.3Disassembly
- 4.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 5Aywun A1-3000
- 5.1First Look
- 5.2Test Results
- 5.3Disassembly
- 5.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 6A-Power P4-A680
- 6.1Test Results
- 6.2Disassembly
- 6.3Specifications and Conclusions
- 7Auriga Power MPT-301
- 7.1Test Results
- 7.2Disassembly
- 7.3Specifications and Conclusions
- 8Numan AT-580H
- 8.1Test Results
- 8.2Disassembly
- 8.3Specifications and Conclusions
- 9Ultraview 750W
- 9.1First Look
- 9.2Test Results
- 9.3Disassembly
- 9.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 10Thermal Master TM-420-PMSR
- 10.1First Look
- 10.2Test Results
- 10.3Disassembly
- 10.4Specifications and Conclusions
- 11Comparisons, Conclusions and Fireworks
- 11.1Graphs
- 11.2Conclusion
- 11.3The Fireworks
Ultraview 750W
First Look
Ultraview is another brand of power supply which has recently appeared on eBay. Buy it now prices are only $25 from some sellers, but I was able to snag this one for just under $20 as the starting bid. Let’s see if we can get some better results out of it (or a better fireworks display) than our last eBay special unit.
Like on the Numan, the label incorrectly claims this to be a dual rail unit. It is really a single rail. The label itself does not appear to be very professionally made – it does not have the full gloss finish like on all other power supplies in this roundup, and the printing is fairly poor quality.
Test Results
Test 1 (75.13W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 2.4A | 12.25V | 42.8mV |
5V | 5.05A | 5.05V | 16.6mV |
3.3V | 4.9A | 3.33V | 12.6mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −11.66V | 35.4mV |
5Vsb | 0.5A | 5.04V | 27.0mV |
AC Power | 99.1W | ||
Efficiency | 75.81% | ||
Power Factor | 0.64 | ||
Intake Temp | 32°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 34°C |
.
Test 2 (103.18W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 4.76A | 12.12V | 49.2mV |
5V | 5.05A | 5.05V | 17.4mV |
3.3V | 4.9A | 3.33V | 13.0mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −11.76V | 44.8mV |
5Vsb | 0.5A | 5.03V | 30.4mV |
AC Power | 132.3W | ||
Efficiency | 77.99% | ||
Power Factor | 0.63 | ||
Intake Temp | 32°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 35°C |
.
Test 3 (154.95W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 9.22A | 11.87V | 73.0mV |
5V | 5.06A | 5.06V | 19.4mV |
3.3V | 4.88A | 3.32V | 16.0mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −11.93V | 61.8mV |
5Vsb | 0.5A | 5.01V | 40.6mV |
AC Power | 196.3W | ||
Efficiency | 78.94% | ||
Power Factor | 0.64 | ||
Intake Temp | 33°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 37°C |
.
Test 4 (201.11W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 9.39A | 12.07V | 92.6mV |
5V | 9.86A | 4.93V | 25.2mV |
3.3V | 10.0A | 3.3V | 22.6mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −12.31V | 77.8mV |
5Vsb | 0.99A | 4.95V | 53.6mV |
AC Power | 251.6W | ||
Efficiency | 79.93% | ||
Power Factor | 0.63 | ||
Intake Temp | 33°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 39°C |
.
Test 5 (249.97W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 13.68A | 11.84V | 114.2mV |
5V | 9.9A | 4.95V | 27.4mV |
3.3V | 9.97A | 3.29V | 25.6mV |
−12V | 0.1A | −12.55V | 93.4mV |
5Vsb | 0.99A | 4.94V | 61.2mV |
AC Power | 321.9W | ||
Efficiency | 77.65% | ||
Power Factor | 0.61 | ||
Intake Temp | 33°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 41°C |
.
Test 6 (291.79W Load)
Rail | Load | Voltage | Ripple |
12V | 17.57A | 11.61V | 135.2mV |
5V | 9.9A | 4.95V | 30.2mV |
3.3V | 9.94A | 3.28V | 28.8mV |
−12V | 0.11A | −12.82V | 111.4mV |
5Vsb | 0.98A | 4.91V | 70.2mV |
AC Power | 387.3W | ||
Efficiency | 75.34% | ||
Power Factor | 0.63 | ||
Intake Temp | 33°C | ||
Exhaust Temp | 43°C |
.
The 12V rail started at 12.25V and dropped to 11.61V in Test 6, giving us worst-case regulation of 0.39V (3.25%) and a drop of 0.64V (5.33%). The 5V rail started at 5.05V and dropped to 4.95V, which gives us 0.05V (1%) regulation and a drop of 0.1V (2%). The 3.3V rail started at 3.33V and dropped to 3.28V, giving us 0.03V (0.91%) regulation, and a drop of 0.05V (1.51%). The 5V and 3.3V rails results are pretty good, but the 12V rail’s result is poor. Only the Honli ATX-680 could manage worse regulation than this.
As for the efficiency, I didn’t quite see an 80% reading, but we got so close in test 4 that I’ll give the PSU the benefit of the doubt, since my equipment doesn’t offer the absolute best of accuracy. The exhaust temperature was 2°C warmer to start with and 10°C warmer in Test 6, which is fairly normal for this power level. The power supply could not even deliver half its rating. I attempted to increase the load to about 350W for a seventh test, but the power supply would shut down, so there will be no fireworks from this power supply, unfortunately.
Rail | Test 5 (249.97W) | Test 6 (291.79W) |
12V | ||
5V | ||
3.3V | ||
−12V | ||
5Vsb |
.
The ripple suppression was unacceptable at high loads. At 200W load, the 5VSB rail was just slightly above the maximum allowed limit. At 300W load, the 5VSB was over by 20mV and the 12V rail was also out of spec. The 5V and 3.3V rails were just slightly above half the maximum.
Disassembly
The input filtering consists of two X capacitors, two common-mode chokes and two Y capacitors, which is enough components. Instead of a bridge rectifier, the unit uses 2A bridge diodes. The two primary capacitors are branded Zhifa. They are labelled as 470µF, but one tested 295µF and the other read 297µF – indicating that they are over-rated. The switching transistors are JD Semiconductors 13009A parts, which are rated for 12A. If the results of other units in this roundup are anything to go by, they would probably have blown at 350W load if the OPP hadn’t stepped in. The 5VSB uses a 2-transistor circuit, with a JD BU3150 MOSFET rated for 3A as the main switcher. The critical capacitor is made by ChengX – not one of the high quality brands.
The 12V rectifier is a MOSPEC F20C20C – a Fast Recovery Rectifier rated for 20A. The other rails use S20C40C Schottky rectifiers, which are also rated for 20A. This is just barely enough for the 3.3V rail, but the other two rails are claimed to be capable of more than 20A, so these parts are insufficient. Some of the secondary capacitors are supplied by H.Q. and others are supplied by Zhifa – neither of which are high quality brands. There are also no PI filtering coils , which explains why the ripple was high.
There are also some noteworthy problems with the soldering. The first thing that caught my eye was that some solder had been spilled on the component side of the PCB – joining two resistors. Luckily, the two pins which it touches are also joined under the PCB, so it didn’t stop the unit from working, but the manufacturer really should be a bit more careful with their soldering. The other problem is that there is not enough solder holding one of the wires down. The wire in question is a 5V wire leading to a molex and SATA connector. If it came out, it would stop the connected drive(s) from working.
The fan is branded Wam, and it is not temperature controlled. It was audible throughout the testing, but not disturbingly loud. It doesn’t have a removable plug under the sticker, so I can’t check the lubricant, but I have seen several WAM fans get noisy and fail, so we can be fairly sure that the lubricant is insufficient. The heatsinks are on the thin side, but could be much worse.
Specifications and Conclusions
Real Wattage | 150W |
OEM | Unknown |
PFC | None |
Price | $25 AUD |
ATX Connector type | 20+4 pin |
Worst-case voltage regulation (12v, 5v, 3.3v) | 3.25%, 1.0%, 0.9% |
Worst-case ripple (12v, 5v, 3.3v) | 135.2mV, 30.2mV, 28.8mV |
Worst-case efficiency | 75.34% |
Input filtering | Adequate |
CPU Connector | ATX/EPS12V (4+4pin) |
PCI-E Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Molex (Peripheral) Connectors | 2 |
FDD Power connectors | 1 |
SATA Power connectors | 4 |
.
Pros: Working OPP
Cons: Can’t even deliver half of labelled rating (−3), Low quality capacitors (−2), Ripple out of spec at high loads (−2), Mediocre voltage regulation (−1), Low quality fan (−1), Problems with soldering (−1)
Score: 0/10