The 2014 El-Cheapo Power Supply Roundup

Ultraview 750W

First Look

Ultraview is another brand of power supply which has recently appeared on eBay. Buy it now prices are only $25 from some sellers, but I was able to snag this one for just under $20 as the starting bid. Let’s see if we can get some better results out of it (or a better fireworks display) than our last eBay special unit.

uv750-label uv750

Like on the Numan, the label incorrectly claims this to be a dual rail unit. It is really a single rail. The label itself does not appear to be very professionally made – it does not have the full gloss finish like on all other power supplies in this roundup, and the printing is fairly poor quality.

Test Results

Test 1 (75.13W Load)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 2.4A 12.25V 42.8mV
5V 5.05A 5.05V 16.6mV
3.3V 4.9A 3.33V 12.6mV
−12V 0.1A −11.66V 35.4mV
5Vsb 0.5A 5.04V 27.0mV
AC Power 99.1W
Efficiency 75.81%
Power Factor 0.64
Intake Temp 32°C
Exhaust Temp 34°C

.
Test 2 (103.18W Load)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 4.76A 12.12V 49.2mV
5V 5.05A 5.05V 17.4mV
3.3V 4.9A 3.33V 13.0mV
−12V 0.1A −11.76V 44.8mV
5Vsb 0.5A 5.03V 30.4mV
AC Power 132.3W
Efficiency 77.99%
Power Factor 0.63
Intake Temp 32°C
Exhaust Temp 35°C

.
Test 3 (154.95W Load)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 9.22A 11.87V 73.0mV
5V 5.06A 5.06V 19.4mV
3.3V 4.88A 3.32V 16.0mV
−12V 0.1A −11.93V 61.8mV
5Vsb 0.5A 5.01V 40.6mV
AC Power 196.3W
Efficiency 78.94%
Power Factor 0.64
Intake Temp 33°C
Exhaust Temp 37°C

.
Test 4 (201.11W Load)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 9.39A 12.07V 92.6mV
5V 9.86A 4.93V 25.2mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 22.6mV
−12V 0.1A −12.31V 77.8mV
5Vsb 0.99A 4.95V 53.6mV
AC Power 251.6W
Efficiency 79.93%
Power Factor 0.63
Intake Temp 33°C
Exhaust Temp 39°C

.
Test 5 (249.97W Load)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 13.68A 11.84V 114.2mV
5V 9.9A 4.95V 27.4mV
3.3V 9.97A 3.29V 25.6mV
−12V 0.1A −12.55V 93.4mV
5Vsb 0.99A 4.94V 61.2mV
AC Power 321.9W
Efficiency 77.65%
Power Factor 0.61
Intake Temp 33°C
Exhaust Temp 41°C

.
Test 6 (291.79W Load)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 17.57A 11.61V 135.2mV
5V 9.9A 4.95V 30.2mV
3.3V 9.94A 3.28V 28.8mV
−12V 0.11A −12.82V 111.4mV
5Vsb 0.98A 4.91V 70.2mV
AC Power 387.3W
Efficiency 75.34%
Power Factor 0.63
Intake Temp 33°C
Exhaust Temp 43°C

.
The 12V rail started at 12.25V and dropped to 11.61V in Test 6, giving us worst-case regulation of 0.39V (3.25%) and a drop of 0.64V (5.33%). The 5V rail started at 5.05V and dropped to 4.95V, which gives us 0.05V (1%) regulation and a drop of 0.1V (2%). The 3.3V rail started at 3.33V and dropped to 3.28V, giving us 0.03V (0.91%) regulation, and a drop of 0.05V (1.51%). The 5V and 3.3V rails results are pretty good, but the 12V rail’s result is poor. Only the Honli ATX-680 could manage worse regulation than this.

As for the efficiency, I didn’t quite see an 80% reading, but we got so close in test 4 that I’ll give the PSU the benefit of the doubt, since my equipment doesn’t offer the absolute best of accuracy. The exhaust temperature was 2°C warmer to start with and 10°C warmer in Test 6, which is fairly normal for this power level. The power supply could not even deliver half its rating. I attempted to increase the load to about 350W for a seventh test, but the power supply would shut down, so there will be no fireworks from this power supply, unfortunately.

Rail Test 5 (249.97W) Test 6 (291.79W)
12V uv750-test5-12v uv750-test6-12v
5V uv750-test5-5v uv750-test6-5v
3.3V uv750-test5-3.3v uv750-test6-3.3v
−12V uv750-test5--12v uv750-test6--12v
5Vsb uv750-test5-5vsb uv750-test6-5vsb

.

The ripple suppression was unacceptable at high loads. At 200W load, the 5VSB rail was just slightly above the maximum allowed limit. At 300W load, the 5VSB was over by 20mV and the 12V rail was also out of spec. The 5V and 3.3V rails were just slightly above half the maximum.

Disassembly

uv750-primary uv750-secondary

The input filtering consists of two X capacitors, two common-mode chokes and two Y capacitors, which is enough components. Instead of a bridge rectifier, the unit uses 2A bridge diodes. The two primary capacitors are branded Zhifa. They are labelled as 470µF, but one tested 295µF and the other read 297µF – indicating that they are over-rated. The switching transistors are JD Semiconductors 13009A parts, which are rated for 12A. If the results of other units in this roundup are anything to go by, they would probably have blown at 350W load if the OPP hadn’t stepped in. The 5VSB uses a 2-transistor circuit, with a JD BU3150 MOSFET rated for 3A as the main switcher. The critical capacitor is made by ChengX – not one of the high quality brands.

The 12V rectifier is a MOSPEC F20C20C – a Fast Recovery Rectifier rated for 20A. The other rails use S20C40C Schottky rectifiers, which are also rated for 20A. This is just barely enough for the 3.3V rail, but the other two rails are claimed to be capable of more than 20A, so these parts are insufficient. Some of the secondary capacitors are supplied by H.Q. and others are supplied by Zhifa – neither of which are high quality brands. There are also no PI filtering coils , which explains why the ripple was high.

uv750-solder-spill uv750-soldering-flaw

There are also some noteworthy problems with the soldering. The first thing that caught my eye was that some solder had been spilled on the component side of the PCB – joining two resistors. Luckily, the two pins which it touches are also joined under the PCB, so it didn’t stop the unit from working, but the manufacturer really should be a bit more careful with their soldering. The other problem is that there is not enough solder holding one of the wires down. The wire in question is a 5V wire leading to a molex and SATA connector. If it came out, it would stop the connected drive(s) from working.

uv750-fan uv750-internals

The fan is branded Wam, and it is not temperature controlled. It was audible throughout the testing, but not disturbingly loud. It doesn’t have a removable plug under the sticker, so I can’t check the lubricant, but I have seen several WAM fans get noisy and fail, so we can be fairly sure that the lubricant is insufficient. The heatsinks are on the thin side, but could be much worse.

Specifications and Conclusions

Real Wattage 150W
OEM Unknown
PFC None
Price $25 AUD
ATX Connector type 20+4 pin
Worst-case voltage regulation (12v, 5v, 3.3v) 3.25%, 1.0%, 0.9%
Worst-case ripple (12v, 5v, 3.3v) 135.2mV, 30.2mV, 28.8mV
Worst-case efficiency 75.34%
Input filtering Adequate
CPU Connector ATX/EPS12V (4+4pin)
PCI-E Connectors 1x 6-pin
Molex (Peripheral) Connectors 2
FDD Power connectors 1
SATA Power connectors 4

.

Pros: Working OPP

Cons: Can’t even deliver half of labelled rating (−3), Low quality capacitors (−2), Ripple out of spec at high loads (−2), Mediocre voltage regulation (−1), Low quality fan (−1), Problems with soldering (−1)

Score: 0/10

Fail award

< Previous Page | Next Page >

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11