In Win Power Man IP-S400EQ3-2 Review

Load Testing

Test 1 (116.56W Load – Cold)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 4.84A 12.1V 13.2mV
5V 4.98A 4.98V 8.2mV
3.3V 10.03A 3.31V 8.6mV
-12V 0A -12.17V 9.0mV
5Vsb 0A 5.03V 20.6mV
AC Power 125.76W
Efficiency 92.96%
Power Factor 0.93

 

Test 2 (205.93W Load – Cold)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 9.7A 12.13V 18.0mV
5V 9.9A 4.95V 9.8mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 8.2mV
-12V 0.1A -12.09V 23.8mV
5Vsb 1A 5.0V 9.2mV
AC Power 223.82W
Efficiency 92.01%
Power Factor 0.94

 

Test 3 (264.03W Load – Cold)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 14.51A 12.09V 22.0mV
5V 9.94A 4.97V 11.2mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 8.8mV
-12V 0.1A -12.12V 29.0mV
5Vsb 1A 5.0V 10.4mV
AC Power 283.66W
Efficiency 93.08%
Power Factor 0.96

 

Test 4 (320.97W Load – Cold)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 19.26A 12.04V 26.6mV
5V 9.98A 4.99V 13.2mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 9.0mV
-12V 0.1A -12.14V 34.0mV
5Vsb 1A 5.0V 12.0mV
AC Power 347.32W
Efficiency 92.41%
Power Factor 0.96

 

 Test 5 (376.48W Load – Cold)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 23.96A 11.98V 28.0mV
5V 10.02A 5.01V 14.8mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 9.0mV
-12V 0.1A -12.17V 39.8mV
5Vsb 1.0A 5.0V 13.8mV
AC Power 408.4W
Efficiency 92.18%
Power Factor 0.97

 

Test 6 (404.11W Load – Warm)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 26.31A 11.96V 32.6mV
5V 10.02A 5.01V 15.0mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 9.2mV
-12V 0.1A -12.18V 42.0mV
5Vsb 1A 4.99V 15.4mV
AC Power 441.87W
Efficiency 91.45%
Power Factor 0.97

 

Overload Test (485.22W Load – Warm)

Rail Load Voltage Ripple
12V 33.26A 11.88V 40.0mV
5V 10.08A 5.04V 18.6mV
3.3V 10.0A 3.3V 9.8mV
-12V 0.1A -12.21V 50.6mV
5Vsb 1A 5.0V 18.0mV
AC Power 537.66W
Efficiency 90.25%
Power Factor 0.98

 

Wow. Just look at those efficiency numbers! Never does it drop below 90%. Admittedly, though, it was a cold day, so things didn’t warm up as much as I was hoping, but it’s impressive nonetheless.

The maximum deviation on the 12V rail was 0.13V, or 1.08%, during Test 2. I dropped to 11.96V at full load, which equates to a 1.42% drop. On the 5V rail was off by 0.05V, or 1% during test 1, and it went up to 5.01V during test 6. That gives us a 1.2% variation. The 3.3V rail was at 3.31V during test 1 and right on 3.3V throughout the other tests. That gives us 0.3% regulation there. That’s an excellent result on all of the rails.

Like the IP-S400CQ2-0, I overloaded it to just over 480W without incident. Everything was still in spec, but there was a drop in the efficiency.

Rail Test 6 (404.11W) Overload Test (485.22W)
12V
5V
3.3V
-12V
5Vsb

 

The ripple is slightly higher than it was on the CQ2-0, but it’s still very good, and never even gets to half of the maximum allowed on any of the rails, even during the overload test.

Pages: 1 2 3 4