I, myself, wrote:Ripple in / ripple out = (Z+X)/Z
Okay, I stand corrected on that formula — combining resistance and reactance doesn't work that way (as stated in
this article). Instead, they add together like this:
sqrt(<resistance>^2+<reactance>^2)
Replace <resistance> (ESR in this case) and <reactance> (of the inductor, here) with the values. In that equation, it doesn't actually matter which way around they are, as they are added together. Take
that and divide by the ESR to get your filtering ratio. (The high ratio I gave in that post was not far off, though.)
What that means is that if resistance and reactance are the same, ripple voltage will only be divided by root-2 (1.414…) instead of 2. Another thing about reactance is is that, if you put a capacitance and an inductance in series, the smaller of the two reactances will
subtract from the larger one, instead of the two adding together…
(The internet here is performing
extra-terribly now. Almost makes me wonder if an
actual dial-up connection would be faster.)
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.
My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.