by LongRunner » December 24th, 2013, 10:20 pm
(Get your resistors ready.)
I have seen - on Badcaps.net, no less - a "statement" that the output filters in PSUs are tuned to resonate at the switching frequency to remove ripple most effectively. But it's never going to work that way, for several reasons:
- Electrolytic capacitors are nowhere near precise or stable enough to be used in a resonant circuit in the first place.
- Nevermind tolerances and aging, their quality factor is simply far too low at the switching frequency to resonate even if you did get the value right.
- And if you did make the filter resonate (for the purpose of this explanation, the component arrangement is what would form a series resonant circuit), you would get hundreds of volts of ripple and your entire PC would be instant ash.
No doubt there is such a thing as "too low" ESR/ESL, but
not for "that" reason. In truth, the capacitors used are probably not the best available but instead chosen with cost in mind. I'm curious about
the practical effect of using caps with different specifications. The reason for showing the ripple waveforms is to distinguish between 100/120Hz ripple that makes it through to the outputs and the actual switching noise (the former not being attentuated much by the filters).
Please stick this thread.
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.
My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.