HIGH QUALITY, HARD TO GET AND CUSTOM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS FOR POWER SUPPLIES, DISPLAYS, TVs, MOTHERBOARDS AND MORE!

Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Discuss the Reviews and Articles on hardwareinsights.com here!

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby Wester547 » October 11th, 2014, 10:09 am

You said the previous two units you tested shut down after you ran them at 450W. Did they both have the same switchers (FQAF11N90C)?
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby c_hegge » October 11th, 2014, 12:59 pm

I know one definitely did. I can't remember what the other one had.
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby LongRunner » March 12th, 2015, 3:23 pm

Because c_hegge apparently forgot to remove the original review, I've just done it for him. (He has promoted me to being an editor just yesterday.)
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby c_hegge » March 12th, 2015, 5:18 pm

Cool.
User avatar
c_hegge
Seasoned Veteran
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: March 16th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Location: North Coast, NSW, Australia

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby Wester547 » August 10th, 2015, 4:53 pm

Any idea what the extra optocoupler is for? As I understand it, one optocoupler is for UC3843, one for Viper22A, and one for TPS3514. Also, 2SK2611 is rated for an ON resistance of 1.4 ohms max and 1.1 typical, and FQAF11N90C 1.1 ohms max and 0.91 ohms typical. That works out to a 27% difference, not a 32% difference.
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby LongRunner » August 11th, 2015, 2:40 am

Wester547 wrote:Any idea what the extra optocoupler is for? As I understand it, one optocoupler is for UC3843, one for Viper22A, and one for TPS3514.

Probably to enable/disable the UC3843.

Also, 2SK2611 is rated for an ON resistance of 1.4 ohms max and 1.1 typical, and FQAF11N90C 1.1 ohms max and 0.91 ohms typical. That works out to a 27% difference, not a 32% difference.

:huh: It says 1.2Ω typical in the datasheet I have for the 2SK2611.

So the typical value is indeed 32% higher for the 2SK2611 than the FQAF11N90C, with the maximum value 27% higher. (If it was 1.1Ω typical for the 2SK2611, like you said, that would be 21% higher than the FQAF11N90C's 0.91Ω.)
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby Behemot » August 11th, 2015, 5:39 am

The alldatasheet says 1.1 ohm http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet- ... asheet.pdf

Datasheet catalog too http://pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datashe ... a/3010.pdf

But I always state maximum value (worst case scenario) as the nominal, that typical is more like marketing…average fuel consumption of car (in unrealistic scenario) or SDP (was it this?) vs. TDP for intel CPUs are another great examples of such BS.
User avatar
Behemot
Administrator
 
Posts: 454
Joined: November 28th, 2014, 8:57 am
Location: CZ

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby LongRunner » August 11th, 2015, 6:00 am

The version I have is more recent (2010/01/29) than the one DatasheetCatalog has (2002/06/27). So what prompted the change (none of the other specifications are affected)? (AllDataSheet is "temporarily unavailable", apparently.)

BTW: I know that TDP means "Thermal Design Power", but what's SDP?
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.

My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.
User avatar
LongRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: May 17th, 2013, 5:48 pm
Location: Albany, Western Australia

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby Wester547 » August 11th, 2015, 8:32 am

One of the pictures in the review shows the datecode of the 2SK2611 in the Hipro to be the 5th week of 2007... and the datasheet for 2SK2611 dated September 29th, 2009 shows 1.1 ohms:

http://www.datasheets360.com/pdf/-49800 ... ry=2sk2611
Wester547
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: July 8th, 2012, 2:07 am

Re: Hipro HP-D3057F3H Review V2.0

Postby Behemot » August 13th, 2015, 2:17 am

Scenario Design Power and as long as they state that exists just for mobile CPUs since 2014, they have been using it at least from Core 2 era even though often they actually labeled that as the TDP. So sometimes maximum consumption may be much higher than stated TDP (I think some of the 1366 and 2011 CPUs are an example). Intel always claimed it is "different metrics" (using average etc.) than AMD uses while AMD has been using the same TDP metrics the whole time (absolute maximum), just Intel has been playing games too look better.
User avatar
Behemot
Administrator
 
Posts: 454
Joined: November 28th, 2014, 8:57 am
Location: CZ

Previous

Return to Content Comments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests