by LongRunner » May 7th, 2016, 9:03 am
After over another year, I've rewritten what I intended to add last time.
I've also very briefly noted the 'bridge-less' designs but frankly, I have somewhat mixed feelings about the proposition. Moving to synchronous rectification on the secondary side represented a worthwhile gain of 5%+, but doing away with the bridge rectifier saves maybe 1% of the overall power drain at 230V (2% or so at 120V). I don't know exactly how they implement it, but it surely means more complexity - which, by extension, can be said to reduce reliability (if but slightly). I think it's fair to say we're reaching the point of diminishing returns for PSU efficiency improvements; sure, even a 0.5% saving is nice to have, but not if the process of attaining it causes problems elsewhere.
Granted, the other key components grow in complexity too (albeit much of it within large-scale integrated circuits), but at least that's with the prospect of more computing capabilities. (Even if they're wasted on Joe Average…)
Information is far more fragile than the HDDs it's stored on. Being an afterthought is no excuse for a bad product.
My PC: Core i3 4130 on GA‑H87M‑D3H with GT640 OC 2GiB and 2 * 8GiB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz, Kingston SA400S37120G and WD3003FZEX‑00Z4SA0, Pioneer BDR‑209DBKS and Optiarc AD‑7200S, Seasonic G‑360, Chenbro PC31031, Linux Mint Cinnamon 20.3.